Nonprofit Management Fund
Software Survey Results

 

BACKGROUND

Leaders in the nonprofit community recognize that making full use of technology requires access to the appropriate software products. Based on initial technology assessments and grant making experience, it appears that the absence of resources and information regarding a variety of software products could be a key, limiting factor. A first step in addressing any challenge was to gather and analyze information on current software use in the sector.

In August 2000, a survey was mailed to 900 nonprofit organizations throughout Milwaukee, Waukesha, Washington and Ozaukee counties. In order to reach groups beyond the applicants of the Fund, 720 surveys were mailed to organizations identified by the Milwaukee Foundation, and the National Society of Fund Raising Executives sent another 200 surveys to its members.

Groups could respond either in writing or via email on the Fund’s web site. As an incentive for organizations to complete the survey, those who responded by 9 August 2000 were eligible to win $250 for purchasing software of their choice. Sarah Dean, of the Faye McBeath Foundation, pulled Zink the Zebra as the winning entry.


ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
Approximately 200 organizations returned the survey (a 22% response rate), which provides a significant base of informationon current and planned software use. The respondents reflect a diversity of mission, size and software applications.

The missions of the organizations ranged across the nonprofit sector, with the largest single grouping in human services. The breakdown of respondents by type, in decreasing order, reflects the spectrum of Fund applicants.
 

77/39% Human Services
34/17% Arts & Culture
33/17% Education
21/11% Other (fundraising associations, leadership development, etc.)
21/11% Community/Economic Development
16/8% Health


Broadly, the response rate among organizations according to annual budget size was representative, as well, particularly in the Nonprofit Management Fund’s audience of organizations with annual budgets under $3 million.

68/34%  0 - $249,000
59/30%  $250,000 - $999,999 
46/23%  $1,000,000 - 2,999,999
27/13%  $3,000,000 and above


SOFTWARE TYPES

From the survey, the most striking results regarding software usage at nonprofits in Milwaukee, include the following facts:


  •  Nearly 80% of all organizations, regardless of annual budget, are using accounting and database software tools.


  •  In all budget ranges, however, membership software applications  hover near or below 50%.


  • Fund development software is the one category studied that correlates most strongly with budget size. In organizations with budgets under $1,000,000, 40/31% used fund development software.  By comparison, 60/80% organizations with budgets over $1,000,000 use some sort of fund development software.  The larger the organization, the more likely that software plays a substantial role in fundraising.  (Fund development software was virtually non-existent for those organizations with budgets under $100,000).

SOFTWARE BRANDS

The data analysis confirms that there are many software brands in use, although a few mainstream products are most popular.

The two most popular off-the-shelf accounting packages are QuickBooks (83/42%) and Peachtree (26/13%); the most frequently purchased program specifically designed for nonprofit fund accounting is MIP from Micro Information Products (12/6%).
 

  Quickbooks Peachtree Micro Information 
Products
None
Arts & Culture 17/50% 4/8% 2/3% 4/8%
Community/Economic Dev. 11/50%  3/14% 3/14% 4/18%
Education 13/39% 6/18% 0/0% 6/18%
Health 3/18% 3/18% 1/6% 5/29%
Human Services  31/40% 6/8% 6/8% 6/8%
Other 8/42% 4/21% 0/0% 2/11%


With respect to fund development, 104/52% of respondents surveyed maintained that they do not deploy dedicated fundraising software, while 25/13% of the organizations use Blackbaud Raiser’s Edge for this purpose.  Campaign Associates is preferred by 12/6% organizations.
 

  Blackbaud
Raiser's Edge*
Campaign
Associates
None
Arts & Culture 6/18% 1/3% 21/62%
Community/Economic Dev. 0%  0%  17/81%
Education 5/15% 2/6% 17/52%
Health 3/19%  0% 4/25%
Human Services 9/12% 6/8% 33/43%
Other 0% 0% 13/63%

* In addition to naming software tools, organizations were asked to identify software user groups to which they belonged.  Although most organizations did not answer this question, 15/8% organizations noted that they belong to a user group for Raiser’s Edge, a fundraising software package.

For membership software, 46/23% of the organizations rely on Access and 10/5% use GiftMaker; however, 106/53% indicated that they do not use any  membership software.
 

   Access  Giftmaker None
Arts & Culture 7/21% 2/6% 16/47%
Community/Economic Dev.  9/43%  1/5% 9/43%
Education 6/18% 2/6% 17/52%
Health  5/31% 0% 8/50%
Human Services 13/17% 3/4% 47/61%
Other 6/32% 2/11% 9/47%

Regarding database management, 89/45% organizations responded that Access  was the preferred software program,  while 76/38% organizations use Excel to track information.  Furthermore, 24/12% organizations meet their database needs with a combination  of  Access and Excel.
 

  Access Excel Filemaker Works None
Arts & Culture 14/41% 10/29% 4/12% 5/15% 3/9%
Community/Economic Dev. 13/62% 7/33% 1/5% 0/0% 3/14%
Education 9/27% 14/42% 6/18% 1/3% 6/18%
Health 7/44% 8/50% 0/0% 0/0% 2/13%
Human Services 34/44% 31/40% 3/4% 4/5% 8/10%
Other 12/63% 6/32% 0/0% 1/5% 3/16%

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES IN USE

When queried about  “which technology resources have been most useful in your organization?” responses varied from those that did not cite any resources to those which have internal information technology departments.

At the low end of the scale are those organizations which noted that the staff  “have not used any [resources] but could sure use help!”  and “resources for consulting needed.  Using tech support from [software] programs.”  Another respondent lamented “none at the present time - they want to ‘sell’ you products, not support or training.”

In the middle range are numerous organizations that report taking advantage of a collection of resources, such as “Internet user groups, resellers, peers” and “friends/associates/consultants”. This group tends to rely on expertise from Board Directors or volunteers, and supplements those efforts with paid consultants for special work, such as database, network, and web design.

Based on this group of respondents, nonprofits in Milwaukee are taking advantage of classes and sending their staff to learn new skills.  Common responses on the survey included: “hands on training”; “1 day workshops, usually Pryor Resources”;  “Nonprofit Center Classes/Seminars”; and “UWM”.  One group reported using a trade journal for gaining insight on the best technology practices in the sector.

A few organizations identified their own help desk or a MIS department as the most useful resource.  Others commented on the availability of their parent organization; some pay annual fees for technical support from vendors.

Of all resources identified, the Internet, email, and on-line chat rooms  were among the most commonly mentioned resources.  Several  groups specifically noted that they have received assistance from www.compumentor.org, an on-line resource.


Software Survey
N = 920 n = 200
Response Rate = 22%
NMF Returned: 172
NSFRE Returned: 28

1. Which word or phrase best describes your organization's mission?

34 Arts & Culture 16 Health
21 Community/Economic Development 77 Human Services
33 Education 21 Other
      Other ranges from fundraising groups to leadership development

2. What is your organization's annual revenue category for the current fiscal year?

35 Under $100,000 31 $250,000 - $499,999 31 $1,000,000 - $1,999,999 13 $3,000,000 - $5,000,000
33 $100,000 - $249,999 28 $500,000 - $999,999 15 $2,000,000 - $2,999,999 14 Over $5,000,000

3. Which software program do you use for accounting?

87 Quickbooks 5 Other: Outside source 2 One Write Plus
28 None 3 American Fundware 2 Other: not specified
27 Peachtree 3 Fund EZ 2 Quicken
11 Micro Information Products 3 Solomon IV for Windows 19 Other*
6 AccPac 2 Cougar Mountain Software 6 Great Plains
2 One Write Plus 5 Blackbaud Raiser's Edge 2 Cyma IV

4. Which software program do you use for fund development?

104 None 7 Donor Perfect 3 PledgeMaker
25 Blackbaud Raiser's Edge 5 JSI Paradigm 3 Giftmaker Pro
12 Campaign Associates 5 Other: Not specified 2 Metafile Results Plus
8 Access 4 Fund Raiser Basic 19 Other*
7 Results Plus 4 Giftmaker    

5. Which software program do you use for membership?

109 None 3 ACT 2 JSI Paradigm
46 Access 2 Blackbaud Raiser's Edge 2 PledgeMaker
11 Giftmaker 2 Excel 2 Results Plus
5 Other: Not specified 2 Filemaker 22 Other*

6. Which software program do you use for other database applications?

91 Access 11 Works 4 Paradox
77 Excel 4 Approach 3 Fox Pro
25 None 4 ACT 2 WordPerfect
15 Filemaker 4 Microsoft Word 19 Other*

*Other software applications only identified by 1 organization

7. Do you plan to purchase software programs during the next 12 months?

81/41% Yes
119/59% No
 
If yes list the programs*
22/27%
  Database programs
10/12%
  Microsoft Office 2000
12/15%
  Accounting programs
11/14%
  Were unsure what software to purchase
10/12%
  Fund development programs
8 /10%
  Other programs
7 /9%
  Graphics and desktop publishing software
6 /7%
  Not reported

*Five organizations reported more than one software category or package.

8. To which software user groups, if any, do you belong?

26/13% of respondents belonged to software user groups.
Software user group name
Number of participating organizations
Raiser's Edge
15
MIP Users Group
2
Fund Development
2
Campaign Associates
1
Forum of FAQs and Council on Foundations
1
Mac user group - Double Click
1
Microsoft Office
1
Novell
1
Solomon IV for Windows
1
Yvisa/Ymetro
1

9. Which technology resources have been the most useful to your organization?

100/50% of respondents responded to this question.
Useful Technology Resources
Number of organizations
The Internet
20
Technology consultants
19
Internal staff
7
Technical support
14
Microsoft products and/or support
5
Other
35

If you have any comments or suggestions about this web site, please e-mail webmaster@nonprofitmanagementfund.org