Nonprofit
Management Fund
Proposal
Review Criteria
In an effort to increase
the clarity and transparency of the criteria used to review proposals
submitted to the Nonprofit Management Fund, the Fund has published
its Proposal Review Criteria. The following is a list of the criteria
used by the Fund Advisor and the grants sub-committee when reviewing
grant applications.
What criteria
are taken into consideration in reviewing applications to the Fund?
-
The
extent to which the applicant request matches the Fund's guidelines.
-
The clarity of the narrative - regarding the nature of management
challenges, type of assistance sought, and results to be achieved.
-
The completeness of the budget, including cash and in-kind match
documentation.
-
Whether or not competing bids were sought from three consultants.
-
The quality of the selected consultant's workplan, including
the match between the nonprofit's description of the challenges
with the resolution strategies proposed, and the details regarding
the consultant's role and deliverables.
-
The degree to which the proposed project improves the management
or governance of the applicant organization.
-
For past grantees, the extent to which there will be
a longer-term impact on the management or governance of the
organization.
-
The availability of the Fund's grantmaking resources.
What types
of proposals are more likely to be declined?
-
Applicants that do not clearly meet the eligibility guidelines,
such as state-wide organizations.
-
Applications that are written by the consultant.
-
Proposals that do not present a clear case for the identified
management or governance challenge or the potential for
results.
-
Proposals that request funding for activities, which appear
to be ongoing in nature and should be covered in the operating
budget, such as printing of promotional materials or costs associated
with the annual audit.
-
Proposals that appear to overlap substantially with previously-funded
projects for the same organization.
-
Large-scale projects where the Fund's grant would be an insignificant
portion of the overall effort.
-
Projects that do not show evidence of commitment from the Board
or executive leadership.
-
Projects that engage an independent contractor to perform typical
staff functions.
What types
of projects appear to have the greatest potential for success?
(Back
to Policies)
|